Top-four myths of the California drought – from the Northern California Water Association

One of the unfortunate byproducts of the current drought are the myths circulating regarding water use and the means for addressing the water crisis in the state.  Some are perpetuations of myths developed during past water crises.  Others build upon misinformation that has a more recent origin.  Below are four myths that you may see in media accounts of the drought.

1) Agriculture uses 80 percent of water in the state.

According to the 2013 California Water Plan, in an average water year, agriculture uses 41 percent of the applied water in California (California Water Plan 2013, Volume 1, page 3-35).  Urban water uses total 10 percent and various environmental uses total 49 percent of applied water in the state.

wateruse.CA

Click on image to see the full infographic.

But, if we are truly talking about the “water in the state,” according to the Water Plan, “California, in an average water year…receives about 200 maf [million acre-feet] of water from precipitation and imports from Colorado, Oregon, and Mexico.”  Agricultural water use totals 32.9 million acre-feet in an average year, or 16.5 percent of water received in the state (California Water Plan 2013, Volume 1, page 3-31 and 3-32).

2) Unlike urban water users who have just received a mandatory 25% reduction in water use, agricultural water users have not had their water supplies cut.

Last year, while those of us living in urban areas were tasked with voluntarily reducing water use, agricultural water users were suffering devastating cutbacks in supplies, many receiving no water or up to 5 percent of their contracted amounts.  This year, even the most senior agricultural water rights holders in the state will be cut back at least 25 percent.  Most will be cut back much more than that, if they get any water at all.  According to the California Farm Water Coalition, this will result in 30 percent of the irrigated farmland in the state receiving no surface water and approximately 620,000 acres (which equals almost 970 square miles) of fallowed land this year. These cutbacks will not only impact agricultural lands, but also the terrestrial habitat lands (such as wildlife refuges and managed wetlands) that are supplied water by the agricultural water agencies.

3) The water rights in the state are over-appropriated.

Over the past several years, there have been claims that California’s water system is overappropriated by five times and is therefore somehow broken. This statement mischaracterizes the California water rights system and ignores the fundamental and sophisticated way water is managed in the state.

Those claiming that the water rights are overappropriated have taken all of the water rights maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), added them up, and declared that the state’s water rights total more than the available water and thus the state is overappropriated.  What this ignores are the considerable non-consumptive water rights, the substantial water reuse and recoverable losses in the state’s water system and the restrictions on water rights.  The overappropriation myth is debunked in more detail in the following blog: Using Water Multiple Times in California Explaining the California Water Rights Over-Appropriation Myth.

For more information on California’s water rights system, visit the State Water Resources Control Board website at: FAQS: Water Rights.

4) New surface water storage would not help during a drought year.

As an example of how additional surface storage would help during a drought year, the Department of Water Resources has analyzed that if Sites offstream reservoir was in place in 2015, it would have stored an additional 410,000 acre-feet of water this very dry water year. The water that would have filled Sites reservoir is largely from the December 2014 and the February 2015 storms.  Importantly, if Sites reservoir was in operation today, total north of Delta storage this year would have increased by 900,000 acre-feet, including an additional 280,000 acre-feet in Shasta reservoir.  This additional water could be used for multiple purposes: fish, farms, birds, cities, recreation and to help maintain salinity levels in the Delta.

For more information from the Department of Water Resources on the benefits Sites reservoir would provide this year, visit: FAQS: The Drought and Sites Reservoir.

Link to post by the Northern California Water Association

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Top-four myths of the California drought – from the Northern California Water Association

  1. willie bales says:

    We need more surface water storage,
    if our state is going to grow.
    It would be like saving for a sunny day
    instead of a rainy day.

  2. Joe hartley says:

    The dishonesty behind this pie chart is the implication that the 49% that goes to the aquatic environment is somehow equal to human’s diversion of water for other purposes. Let’s just take all that water and use it for ag & humans and see what kind of place we have to live in. Heck for that matter let’s just drain Lake Tahoe!

    Actually 100% of the water would go to aquatic environment if we weren’t around. So of the roughly 50% that is diverted for human’s use 80% of it is used by agriculture. So let’s not delude ourselves. We water a desert and get great productivity. I love to eat our California fruits & vegetables so I’m not suggesting that ag shouldn’t be the biggest user of water but the State Department of Ag shouldn’t be dishonest. As someone once said, there’s lies, damn lies and statistics.

    • Office of Public Affairs says:

      Joe, thank you for your comment. The pie chart is simply a complete picture of water flowing through California and was generated by the Northern California Water Association, not CDFA, with data produced by the Department of Water Resources.

  3. sms says:

    I have some problems with just building more water storage so our state can continue to grow. 1. Water supplies and populations have a direct effect on each other; California may have reached the carrying capacity of it’s resources. With the climate being wet/dry cycles here, more numbers of people when the next big drought hits (even with more water storage) will just be worse. 2. Water storage without water conservation and a population with increased numbers and no real understanding of the land they call home is a recipe for disaster: we are witnessing some of that right now. While 10 % of the California economy is agriculture based, much of our population lives in an urban environment and many do not understand where their food comes from. 3. It isn’t just people and agriculture; California has been blessed with truly unique and amazing flora and fauna that is found no where else in the world. Respect and consideration for the land we call home includes caring for the natural resources we have been (seemingly up to now) taking for granted. It is (as always) not a “One size fits all” solution or mentality. It is time to truly think outside the box because as we have witnessed, 19th century mindsets will not begin to address the problems in the 21st century.

  4. Jerry Duarte says:

    Create lake San Pablo by installing a low head dam in San Pablo bay cityand stop the salt water from contaminating the Delta.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*