Planting Seeds - Food & Farming News from CDFA

Figs are ripe for the picking – from the Santa Rosa Press Democrat

Ripened figs

By Jeff Cox

How lucky we are to live in this region’s Mediterranean climate — because we can eat fresh, tree-ripened figs!

Folks who live outside of (our region) may have never tasted a fig pulled right off the tree. A tree-ripened fig is sweet and fruity, luscious, intriguingly flavored, and pure joy on the palate.

Here’s how you can spot a tree-ripe fig. Unripe figs may color up but they’re not quite ripe yet. They stand out from the branch on stiff peduncles — the bit of wood that attaches the fruit to the branch. When the fig is truly tree-ripe, that peduncle softens and the fig hangs loosely from the branch. That’s the signal — and then the race is on — between the human fig aficionado and the little Argentine ants that have turned our state into a giant ant colony — to see who can harvest them first. (They) love figs as much as we do.  Maybe more.

Figs are native to the Levant (the nations of Cyprus, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, and Turkey) and have been cultivated for about 11,000 years, making them one of the first crops when agriculture was developed. An early farmer would certainly have loved the fact that they dry easily and store that way for months, providing energy and food during lean winters

For many people, the Black Mission variety, first planted in California at Mission San Diego in 1769, sets the standard for quality. Lovers of yellow figs praise Calimyrna figs, whose amber flesh is sweet and nutty.

If you’ve driven around Fresno on Highway 99, you may have seen acres of fig trees with paper bags attached to them. The bags cover the fruits to prevent over-pollination and subsequent split fruit.

While most figs don’t need pollination to develop, Calimyrna figs do. Of the thousands of cuttings of Turkish Smyrna figs brought to California in the 1880s, not one bore fruit. It was discovered that a tiny fig wasp must pollinate the Turkish figs, and so the wasps were imported to California and now work those paper bag fig orchards producing Calimyrnas.

Calimyrna is a name combining “California” and “Smyrna.” The variety itself, however, is not one produced through a breeding program, but it is from one of the cuttings brought to California in the latter part of the 19th century. It is identical to the Lob Injir variety (a sub-variety of Smyrna) that has been grown in Turkey for many centuries and is considered by many to be the world’s tastiest fig. Figs are nutritious, with sugar, dietary fiber, calcium, potassium and good stores of thiamine, riboflavin and niacin.

Link to full article

Learn more about California figs

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research launches multi-million-dollar international effort to accelerate crop development

FFAR logo

The Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR), a nonprofit organization established through bipartisan congressional support in the 2014 Farm Bill, has joined with a number of private sector partners to launch the Crops of the Future Collaborative, a new consortium that will accelerate crop breeding to meet global food demand 20-50 years in the future. FFAR’s initial $10 million commitment is expected to leverage significant additional investment from partners.

With the world population projected to reach 9.8 billion people by 2050, the Crops of the Future Collaborative will accelerate crop breeding through an innovative public-private model that pools proprietary knowledge, financial resources and technology to carry out crop-specific research initially focusing on maize, leafy greens, and wheat and small grains. The consortium will hone in on how a crop’s genetic information can yield traits needed to meet global nutritional demands in a changing environment.

The new consortium will increase capacity to breed crops with specific traits, leading to plants that are adapted to different environments. Target crop characteristics might include enhanced nutritional qualities or ability to withstand environmental challenges such as drought, heat, or flooding. Ultimately, knowledge generated by the Collaborative will be publicly available through scientific publications and informational platforms, benefiting public and private crop breeding efforts.

Link to news release

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

CDFA chemistry lab says farewell to Nirmal Saini after a 41-year career

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross presents a proclamation to Nirmal Saini in honor of his 41 years of public service.

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross presents a proclamation to Nirmal Saini in honor of his 41 years of public service.

Surrounded by his wife, four children, grandchildren, and extended family and friends, Nirmal Saini celebrated his retirement at a luncheon on Friday, June 30. A banquet room full of his colleagues and peers paid tribute to their friend, led by both California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Secretary Karen Ross and Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Director Brian Leahy.

Nirmal Saini’s career in public service has spanned 41 years, 39 of which were at CDFA’s Center for Analytical Chemistry, also known as the chem lab or just “the lab.” In a nutshell,  the lab protects the food supply by ensuring that various foods and feeds meet established standards, from organics and pesticide levels to a range of other chemical analyses for both CDFA and DPR. As branch chief at the lab, Nirmal has had a hand in every major hire, purchase, upgrade or project for decades. He took a sincere interest in the lives and families of lab employees, serving as mentor to many.

He leaves the lab in the capable hands of people whose careers he has nurtured throughout his tenure. Their work is informed by his example and inspired by the spirit of his service. Thank you, Nirmal,  and congratulations.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

July 4th cookout prices down slightly for 2017 – from the Sierra Sun Times

2017 Summer Cookout flier

A cookout of Americans’ favorite foods for the Fourth of July, including hot dogs, cheeseburgers, pork spare ribs, potato salad, baked beans, lemonade and chocolate milk, will cost slightly less this year, coming in at less than $6 per person, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation.

Farm Bureau’s informal survey reveals the average cost of a summer cookout for 10 people is $55.70, or $5.57 per person. The cost for the cookout is down slightly (less than 1 percent) from last year.

“As expected, higher production has pushed retail meat prices down,” said AFBF Director of Market Intelligence Dr. John Newton.

​Competition in the meat case is making grilling for July 4th even more affordable for consumers this year, Newton noted.

“Retail pork prices also declined in 2017, largely due to more pork on the market and ample supplies of other animal proteins available for domestic consumption. Lower beef prices are most likely putting downward pressure on pork prices,” he said.

AFBF’s summer cookout menu for 10 people consists of hot dogs and buns, cheeseburgers and buns, pork spare ribs, deli potato salad, baked beans, corn chips, lemonade, chocolate milk, ketchup, mustard and watermelon for dessert.

With regard to drivers behind the moderate decrease in dairy prices, Newton said, “We continue to see stability in dairy prices because of the improving export market. Chocolate milk will be a little more affordable this July 4th, in part because some retailers are promoting it as a sports recovery drink superior to other sports drinks and water.

He also noted the retail price of American cheese has declined due to very large inventories and a lot of competition in the cheese case.

Newton said retail dairy and meat prices included in the survey are consistent with recent trends and are expected to continue to be stable.

Commenting on watermelon prices, Newton said, “Although U.S. farmers continue to increase watermelon production, consumer demand has also increased, contributing to higher retail prices.”

A total of 97 Farm Bureau members in 25 states served as volunteer shoppers to check retail prices for summer cookout foods at their local grocery stores for this informal survey.

The summer cookout survey is part of the Farm Bureau marketbasket series, which also includes the popular annual Thanksgiving Dinner Cost Survey and two additional surveys of common food staples Americans use to prepare meals at home.

The year-to-year direction of the marketbasket survey tracks closely with the federal government’s Consumer Price Index report for food at home. As retail grocery prices have increased gradually over time, the share of the average food dollar that America’s farm and ranch families receive has dropped.

“Through the mid-1970s, farmers received about one-third of consumer retail food expenditures for food eaten at home and away from home, on average., That figure has decreased steadily and is now about 16 percent, according to the Agriculture Department’s revised Food Dollar Series,” Newton said.

Using the “food at home and away from home” percentage across-the-board, the farmer’s share of this $55.70 marketbasket would be $8.74.

Link to article

Posted in Agricultural Marketing | Leave a comment

CDFA Honors Environmental Farming Science Advisory Panel Member Luana Kiger on Her Retirement

CDFA science adviser Dr. Amrith Gunasekara presents a proclamation from Secretary Karen Ross honoring the USDA's Luana Kiger for her service to CDFA's Environmental Farming Act Science Advisory Panel

CDFA science adviser Dr. Amrith Gunasekara presents a proclamation from Secretary Karen Ross honoring the USDA’s Luana Kiger for her service to CDFA’s Environmental Farming Act Science Advisory Panel

The Environmental Farming Act Science Advisory Panel (Science Panel), appointed by CDFA Secretary Karen Ross, has the critical job of assessing and documenting agriculture’s positive impacts on the environment. The group examines issues like ecosystem services and how they relate to agriculture. The panel has also been responsible for developing the framework for the State Water Efficiency and Enhancement Program (SWEEP) and the Healthy Soils Program (HSP) – two new incentive programs designed to reduced atmospheric greenhouse gases, save water, sequester carbon and increase soil health.

Luana Kiger, Special Assistant to the State Conservationist for the United States Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in California, is one of the founding members of the Science Panel, and her service concludes July 3 when she retires as a federal employee.

“NRCS California, under the leadership of State Conservationist Carlos Suarez, has been an incredible partner for us and Luana has provided many hours of time and advice as we worked to build our incentive programs” said Secretary Ross.

Science Panel chair Don Cameron said, “Luana has been a very engaging member of the Science Panel and provided lots of good direction on our programs. We are going to miss her participation but we are happy she is beginning a new chapter of her life.” 

Ms. Kiger has also helped the Science Panel make important connections with other technical staff in NRCS and other federal agencies.

“Having a key contact person with the right technical expertise at the federal level who can not only provide advice to you but also connect you to other pertinent technical and policy staff is key to getting things done in a timely manner,” said Dr. Amrith Gunasekara, CDFA’s liaison to the science panel and science adviser to the secretary.

Posted in Climate Change, Climate Smart Agriculture, Environment | 1 Comment

Seeking applications for the 2017 Governor’s Environmental and Economic Leadership Awards

GEELA logo

The Governor’s Environmental and Economic Leadership Award (GEELA) is California’s highest environmental honor. The award honors individuals, organizations, and businesses that have demonstrated exceptional leadership and made notable, voluntary contributions in conserving California’s precious resources, protecting and enhancing our environment, building public-private partnerships, and strengthening the state’s economy. Applications for the 2017 awards are being accepted through Friday, August 11, 2017.

Categories

GEELA recipients will be chosen from five categories and one subcategory:

  • Climate Change
  • Automobile Dealer Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Promotion
  • Ecosystem and Land Use Stewardship
  • Environmental Education
  • Sustainable Practices, Communities or Facilities
  • Waste Reduction

Who May Apply/Eligibility

The awards will be presented for voluntary achievements culminated in 2016. Competition is open to all California residents, businesses, nonprofit organizations, professional and trade associations, communities, state and local government entities, tribes, and federal agencies operating in California. Projects are deemed ineligible if they are the result of mitigation, litigation, or required by legislation. Those who applied previously are welcome to apply again.

Award Selection

The annual Governor’s Environmental and Economic Leadership Award is administered by the California Environmental Protection Agency, in partnership with the California Natural Resources Agency, the California Department of Food and Agriculture, the California State Transportation Agency, the California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency, the California Government Operations Agency, the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and the California Health and Human Services Agency.

Past GEELA Awards include (farming/ranching):

Premier Mushrooms  Inc. (2016); Prather Ranch (2015); Sonoma County Winegrape Commission (2015); Parducci Wine Cellars (2014/2009); Lodi Wine Grape Commission (2014); California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance (2014/2010); Joseph Gallo Farms (2012); Houweling’s Nurseries (2011); Venida Packing Company (2010); Gills Onions, LLC (2009); Tejon Ranch Company (2009); Bioenergy Solutions (2009); Dixon Ridge Farms (2008); Kunde Family Estates (2008); Fetzer Vineyards (2008); Mendocino Wine Company (2007); California Dairy Quality Assurance Program (2007); Meyers Farming (2007); Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission (2006); Agricultural Internal Combustion Engine Conversion Incentive (2006); and Hearst Ranch Conservation Project (2006);

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This quiet agricultural ‘moonshot’ could change the future of food – from the Washington Post

A 3D graph of population spikes

By Jenna Gallegos

The global population is skyrocketing, the climate is changing, and diets are shifting. So how do you tackle the problem of feeding 9 billion people by 2050? Assemble an elite team of scientists for a year-long brainstorming session.

The first meeting of “Science Breakthroughs 2030” just convened to discuss the key advances essential for revolutionizing food and agriculture in the next decade. The resounding theme: What’s needed is akin to a moonshot. Or as committee co-chair John D. Floros put it, a “green revolution 2.0.”

“This is something we owe to society … to really look forward as far as we can see and find better solutions,” Floros said.

The effort dates to last fall, when the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR) and the Supporters of Agricultural Research Foundation (SoAR) teamed up to commission a report identifying the greatest challenges, opportunities and knowledge gaps in food and agriculture. The National Academy of Sciences answered the call and assembled the panel of eight staff and 13 scientists from institutions across the country. Their expertise ranges from nutrition to climate science to nanotechnology, and the report they’re set to deliver next March will lay out a “strategic vision” for how to rapidly improve the quality and quantity of food.

Half a century ago, scientists similarly asked how to feed a growing population. Their answer: “invest more in agricultural technology,” recounted Floros. That investment kick-started what became known as the green revolution. During it, new crop varieties, technological advances, changes in agricultural practices and shifts in the storage and transport of food all contributed to a dramatic increase in agricultural output.

But according to some experts, that investment and the growth it fueled has begun to stagnate. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s budget for agricultural research “has been flat for a decade,” noted Robert A. Easter of SoAR. And many green-revolution solutions have reached their limits. Irrigation once made possible an agricultural boon, for example, yet sources for that water are drying up in many places. So the challenge becomes finding new ways to grow crops with less water, Easter said.

Lurking pathogens also threaten the global food supply. “We are one major disease away from starvation,” Floros warned this week. Easter agreed. “We are already grappling with diseases with no obvious solutions,” he said, pointing to citrus-greening disease, which is decimating oranges in Florida. An important cereal crop could be next, Easter added.

Future progress, however, will rely on much more than hardy plants. As discussion in the first “breakthroughs” meeting and interviews afterward made clear, data and computational science already are playing increasingly important roles in agriculture.

“Twenty-first-century challenges require 21st century approaches,” said Sally Rockey, executive director of FFAR. While many people tend to view agriculture as a tradition-bound system, “it really is a cutting-edge science.”

Genomic data is being used to breed new crops and satellite data to identify water and nutrient needs within a field. “There will be data behind every seed we plant,” committee co-chair Susan Wessler said.

There’s even a term for this: precision agriculture. Farmers have begun to use drones and sensors to monitor variations in everything from photosynthesis levels to leaf color. In addition to increasing crop yields, precision agriculture can improve soil and water quality by minimizing the use of excess fertilizer.

Yet work also must be done beyond technology; social sciences and economics come into play. “You can have a great technology,” said Mary Bohman, administrator of USDA’s Economic Research Service, “but if it doesn’t adapt well with [farmers’] business … that technology won’t be adopted.”

The same goes for consumers. “If the consumer does not accept a certain technology … we can have big failures,” Floros said.

Meanwhile, the agricultural workforce is aging and lacks diversity. And, Wessler said, the best and brightest agricultural labs are largely populated by researchers from abroad. In places like China, agriculture is considered a valuable career choice.

Rockey wants the committee to think about “a magnet” to attract young talent in this country. According to Wessler, one powerful hook for students is the opportunity agriculture offers to help humanity.

The Science Breakthroughs 2030 report is targeted for completion before the current farm bill expires. The committee will meet five times this year, mostly behind closed doors. Its initial session was filmed and is available online. To submit comments or ideas to the committee, visit the IdeaBuzz platform.

Link to article

Posted in Climate Change, Drought, Environment, Food Access | Leave a comment

Cultivators of Change – celebrating our shared diversity

Secretary Ross last week at the Cultivating Change Summit in Sacramento.

Secretary Ross last week at the Cultivating Change Summit in Sacramento.

Earlier this month I had pleasure to speak before the Cultivating Change Summit in Sacramento. The summit brought together LGBT agriculturalists from around the world who are working toward an equitable industry environment that is inclusive of all. It was a true honor for me to be recognized at the conference as a 2017 Cultivator of Change.

California celebrates the diversity of our agricultural family. Diversity is not only our strength in agricultural production (large/small, organic/conventional) but also our strength in connecting to our communities and consumers. It’s not just the products we grow and produce, but also about the people who help to farm, harvest, transport and market the food we enjoy every day.

LGBT agriculturalists are an important part of California agriculture – not just for LGBT Pride Month, but every day.

California welcomes and celebrates you as part of our agricultural community!

Posted in Community-based Food System | Leave a comment

Don’t Pack a Pest: Traveler education program expands to include SFO

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross addresses news media today at San Francisco International Airport (SFO).

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross addresses news media today at San Francisco International Airport (SFO).

At a news conference today inside San Francisco International Airport (SFO), officials announced the expansion of the successful “Don’t Pack a Pest” traveler awareness campaign into California.

“Don’t Pack a Pest” helps protect against invasive species introduction in the U.S. and the Caribbean with a simple message:  When You Travel, Declare Agricultural Items, Don’t Pack a Pest.

The program was launched at Miami International Airport several years ago. The ongoing outreach program is a cooperative effort between CDFA, the USDA, United States Customs and Border Protection, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, several Caribbean countries, California’s county agricultural commissioners, and San Francisco International Airport.

“Invasive species have the potential to devastate California’s agricultural industry and its natural resources,” said California Secretary of Agricultural Karen Ross.  “Keeping these invasive species outside of our borders is the most effective way to protect our state,  and the Don’t Pack a Pest campaign aims to help us do just that.”

For more on the project, visit the dontpackapest.com site.

Posted in Invasive Species | Leave a comment

New approach would better serve fish and farmers – from Ag Alert

By Justin Frederickson

The remarkable success of the Butte Creek project highlighted in this issue represents a microcosm of what the new Resiliency Strategy envisions throughout the Sacramento Valley. And recent developments on the Tuolumne River, for example, suggest something similar is occurring in the San Joaquin Valley.

What brings this about? A whole range of factors comes into play. First, there was the drought, accompanied by historic low populations of winter-run salmon and delta smelt. Agricultural water contractors south of the delta and on the west side of the Sacramento Valley saw multiple years of zero or near-zero allocations. Even more-senior contractors were cut back more than anyone ever thought possible.

In the background, existing biological opinions about fish restoration are undergoing review. On the horizon are looming deadlines for formation of groundwater sustainability agencies, local groundwater sustainability plans, and eventual efforts to transition toward long-term groundwater sustainability.

In the Sacramento Valley, problems with winter-run salmon and related restrictions on summer cold-water releases from Shasta Lake constrained and complicated North Valley water deliveries, affecting summer delta operations like never before during the drought. Downstream, fish surveys for the delta smelt came up nearly empty.

Meanwhile, the State Water Resources Control Board released an environmental document proposing 30-to-50 percent “unimpaired flows” for the lower San Joaquin, Tuolumne, Stanislaus and Merced rivers. The board is driving at eventual, equivalent flow requirements on the Sacramento River and in the delta, too. As if all of that weren’t enough, ongoing water rights proceedings before the state water board and a decade of work on a proposed delta conveyance fix face critical, rapidly approaching decision points.

Against this complicated backdrop, efforts such as the Sacramento Valley Salmon Resiliency Strategy, a similar Delta Smelt Resiliency Strategy begun last year and comprehensive proposals by water districts on the lower San Joaquin tributaries are trying to create a path forward.

The basic sentiment is simple: Our year-to-year water situation is terrible, the fish situation is terrible, and both problems are only getting worse. What can we do differently?

As regulatory agencies commit and redirect so much water—and plan to commit and redirect even more—shouldn’t we be trying to reduce the impacts on people? And shouldn’t we want to maximize the chances that all of that water will at least do what it’s supposed to?

The regulators tell us all of that water is supposed to help the fish. But regulating farmers into oblivion doesn’t seem to be working so well for the fish, either. So, farmers want to do for fish much the same thing Sacramento Valley rice farmers did for waterfowl when they worked with conservationists and duck hunters to utilize innovative rice straw decomposition and other practices to transform the Pacific Flyway.

That’s what farmers naturally do so well: Find a solution, fix the problem, manage it and move on.

That represents a big improvement: Working through a mix of required and voluntary actions toward species recovery and resiliency, rather than just survival; focusing on watershed-, landscape- and process-based approaches, rather than isolated, single-species actions; recognizing the relationship between flow and non-flow variables; building conservation partnerships across traditional battle lines; incorporating robust, science-based biological objectives and adaptive management strategies that take account of all species life stages; integrating solutions from ecosystem improvements to flood protection to coordinated reservoir operations to water trading to base flow augmentation and groundwater recharge; and preserving and incorporating working landscapes as part of the overall solution—all are part of a new experiment.

But for the farmers to maintain this course, there must eventually be a result. As with all other water uses in arid California, water foregone or recommitted to the environment must be budgeted and precisely targeted for maximum effect. Incentives must line up. Regulatory and institutional structures must motivate the desired behaviors, and desired behaviors must be recognized, duly credited and rewarded.

Mutual benefits, market forces, mitigation and compensation must be part of the equation. Water rights priorities, water quality and third parties—including landowners and senior water rights holders—must be taken into account. And farmers must have certain assurances, a certain amount of peace and a basic ability to plan into the future to feel they have a fighting chance.

It’s a tall order to be sure—and particularly so in the rough-and-tumble world of California water. But if we’re going to preserve and protect the amazing food production system represented by California agriculture as we try to recover our natural and aquatic ecosystems, it’s going to take a whole new approach.

It’s been painful getting here, but we may be turning a corner. For the good of all, let’s hope it works.

Link to article 

Posted in Drought, Environment | Leave a comment