Planting Seeds - Food & Farming News from CDFA

China’s retaliatory tariffs could have a negative impact on California’s farmers and ranchers

In response to the federal government’s recent decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum, China has ordered retaliatory tariffs on about $2 billion worth of U.S. food and agricultural exports, which could have a significant negative impact on California’s farmers and ranchers.

China, the world’s most populous country, is an important and growing market for California’s agricultural exports. In 2016 alone, our farmers and ranchers sent $2 billion worth of products to the East Asian nation.

The retaliatory tariffs increase the costs of U.S. exports, making our products less affordable for Chinese consumers. While other countries doing business in China will continue to enjoy lower tariffs, our farmers and ranchers will likely experience greater competition and a slowdown in sales. The tariffs will also have a chilling effect on the substantial growth that California’s agricultural exports–including wine–have experienced in China throughout the past decade. Future trade opportunities could be lost as it becomes more difficult for our producers to secure and grow new Chinese markets.

The increased tariffs impact four of California’s top five agricultural exports to China, including pistachios, almonds, wine, and oranges and orange products. These four commodities accounted for $1.34 billion worth of exports to China in 2016.

In addition, the new tariffs target nine of California’s top 10 fruit and nut commodities (by overall international export value). The list includes wine, walnuts, pistachios, table grapes, oranges, strawberries, raisins, lemons and dried plums.

USDA-FAS report: China Imposes Additional Tariffs on Selected US-Origin Products

California Agricultural Exports report

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Late winter storms fall short of “March Miracle” in Sierra – from the Sacramento Bee

By Ryan Sabalow and Dale Kasler 

March’s powerful storms may have saved California from having one of the worst wet seasons on record, but the state’s Sierra snowpack still remains well below average.

April 1 is considered the official end of the California’s rain and snow season. On Monday, the Sierra Nevada snowpack was 52 percent of average, according to readings from automated snow sensors the state Department of Water Resources has placed around the massive mountain range that spans California’s eastern border.

“A good March, but certainly not a great March, and by no means even close to the ‘March Miracle,'” Frank Gehrke, director of snow surveys for the Department of Water Resources, told reporters Monday after conducting a snowpack reading near Echo Summit. His measurement showed snow-water content at just below half of its long-term average at that location.

The Sierra snowpack often is called the state’s largest reservoir. As it melts during the state’s dry, hot months, the water flows into the massive network of reservoirs that ring California’s Central Valley. They store the water and release it to cities and farm throughout the year.

But a lower-than-average snowpack doesn’t necessarily mean California water supply is in dire shape as the state heads into its dry season.

Thanks to water held over from last winter, most of the state’s reservoirs still are in decent shape. As of Monday morning, the state’s largest reservoirs were right at average, according to state Department of Water Resources data.

Much of that is water is from the deluges of 2017, which filled lakes to the brim and prompted Gov. Jerry Brown to declare California’s record-breaking five-year drought at an end.

Shasta and Folsom are above average for this time of year. Folsom is 129 pct of average. Shasta, the state’s largest reservoir, is 105 percent. The only large reservoir in California that’s significantly below average is Oroville, the state’s second largest. It’s being kept at 60 percent full, about a quarter less than it normally would be this time of year.

State water managers have intentionally kept Oroville lower this winter in hopes they could avoid using the lake’s spillway, which is under construction. The spillway failed dramatically in February 2017, prompting a frantic two-day evacuation of 188,000 people below the dam.

Last month’s rainfall gave Sacramento a major boost in local precipitation. March brought 5.37 inches of rain to the city.

An average March in Sacramento is 3.02 inches. Still, March’s soaking wasn’t enough to erase the city’s dry winter. Sacramento stands at 77 percent of average.

It’s much worse in Southern California, where Los Angeles sits at a mere third of average. Even with so little rain in the southern half of the state, the situation hasn’t become desperate. Southern California receives much of its water from the Colorado River and Northern California.

Diamond Valley Lake, a key Southern California drinking water reservoir almost as large as Folsom Lake, filled last winter from water pumped from the north state. On Monday, it was 89 percent full.

Rain is expected to return to the north state this week. The National Weather Service says there’s a 20 percent chance of rain on Thursday in Sacramento. Rain is likely Friday, and could continue on Saturday and Sunday. Californians shouldn’t expect much snow from the storm. So far, the forecast is for a warm storm with snow only at high elevations.

Karla Nemeth, director of Department of Water Resources, attended the Echo Summit snow survey on Monday. She said that while last winter’s heavy storms brought the state out of a long drought, this winter showed that Californians need to be prepared for the next one.

We’ve got one word for all Californians: Conserve,” she said.

Link to article 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Is global public will enough to end hunger? From Agri-Pulse

By Ertharin Cousin

Global public will alone will not end hunger. Increased donor support—while necessary to address immediate emergency food needs—will not create the food system improvements required for ending global hunger. Yes, even in 2016—after several years of decline—the number of hungry people worldwide rose to 815 million, increasing by nearly 38 million since 2015. Reducing this number and honoring the US pledge from the UN Sustainable Development Goal of ending global hunger requires country led, pro-poor food system improvements. As more people migrate to cities, these pro-poor food policies must both include agriculture development strategies and ensure consumer access to affordable, nutritious food.

Attempting to impose requisite change from the global level ignores the leadership of governments and local actors striving to develop their own policies and programs. Effective change requires long-term, local government ownership of macro policy improvements; these improvements in turn drive benefits for everyone—particularly smallholder farmers and poor, non-farm working consumers. These macro policies must create an enabling environment that allows for the formation and growth of local businesses across the agricultural value chain. Businesses of every kind require the predictability that only adequate government policy and legally enforced regulatory frameworks can deliver. Additionally, a consistent operating environment and harmonization across regions benefits US agribusiness working to develop sustainable supply chains demanded by their business model and accountable supply chains demanded by consumers. It also benefits US farmers as communities are able to build local and regional markets for US exports. As interested global donors and policy advocates, we must partner with these local leaders and provide support to facilitate their vision of change.

Partnerships at the country and community level should reflect the needs of the local food system and involve active community members. Government, private sector, academia, donors, NGO’s, and community representatives together can provide necessary tools, such as substantive information, technical advice, distribution, operational implementation, and funding. And context is critical: in no two countries will replicating a successful partnership in one ensure success in the other. The Farm to Market Alliance, for example, is comprised of public and private sector groups looking to link farmers, buyers, and other market actors—such as providers of fertilizer and finance—in order to build demand-led value-chains. While the Farm to Market Alliance has the same objective in each of the three countries it operates, the specific partners in each location differ to reflect the particular needs and actors available in each location. Every country level partnership—while striving to achieve aspirational goals tomorrow—must also provide the tools and talent needed to produce measurable results today.

Consistent progress and results from transparent evaluations are also necessary to ensure that the right policies are enacted and that the correct leaders are involved. Countries that have made the leap from subsistence agriculture to food systems that work for small farmers and consumers demonstrate that information is needed to first identify effective policies, programs, and partnerships—and encourage additional investment. And all of this must occur with the recognition of what is not working and moving on. An aspirational vision of a pro-poor food system takes many years to achieve. What keeps stakeholders and US leadership invested are incremental, measurable results supported by adequate course corrections throughout the process.

The journey from vision to food security also requires research and development, from USDA and land-grant universities as well as international research organizations, to produce the tools necessary for creating catalytic, structural changes across the food system. These research investments must generate more farmer-centered solutions, whether its developing drought tolerant seeds in the Sahel or creating new methods for farmer financing—such as MyAgro, a company which allows farmers to buy seeds, fertilizers, and training services in advance with scratch cards. Not every intervention must be high tech, but admittedly mobile technology will likely drive most innovation through information sharing, data collection and management, and addressing logistical challenges.

Food system improvement strategies have succeeded when implemented consistently over multiple years…and even decades. The Sustainable Development Goals mandates the US—as a global leader and an agricultural powerhouse—to end hunger by 2030. While global public will alone cannot end hunger, we should recognize that it can encourage the investments, partnerships, research, and demands for transparency needed to develop and implement local policies capable of ending hunger.

About the author: Ambassador Ertharin Cousin is currently the Payne Distinguished Lecturer at Stanford’s Spogli Institute and a Visiting Fellow in their Center on Food Security. She also serves as Distinguished Fellow at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. She formerly served as Executive Director of the World Food Program and as the US Representative to UN Agencies for Food and Agriculture.

Link to article

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Farm Bureau, NBA coach team-up for Farm Day

During the week that Ag Day was celebrated in California–last week–the California Farm Bureau’s Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom teamed up with Sacramento Kings coach Dave Joerger for the first “Farm Day” in Sacramento.  CDFA Secretary Karen Ross was invited to participate and meet the school children attending the event. 

Ag Alert story by Ching Lee

More than 1,500 students, teachers and others from the greater Sacramento region converged on the grounds of the California Farm Bureau Federation in Sacramento to learn about agriculture by way of show and tell.

Hosted by the California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom with the Dave Joerger Foundation, Sacramento Farm Day allowed fourth-, fifth- and sixth-graders from 16 Sacramento-area schools the opportunity to see, smell, touch and taste different aspects of California agriculture.

More than 20 different stations representing agricultural products and topics such as wool, cotton, beef, bees, invasive species and healthy food choices provided hands-on educational displays. Future Farmers of America students from Delta High School in Clarksburg brought a variety of livestock to last week’s event.

Elementary schools participating in the event were largely those with high numbers of children from low-income families, or Title 1 schools, CFAITC Executive Director Judy Culbertson said.

Calling the event “a huge success,” Culbertson said Sacramento Farm Day couldn’t have been possible without the support of the different organizations, partners and staff that helped.

Some 100 volunteers, including from CFBF staff, Zenith, Center for Fathers and Families and Central Valley Farmland Trust, were among those who pitched in. The event also received donations from Earth Tower Gardens, Raley’s, Green Acres, Sacramento Kings Foundation and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District.

Secretary Ross with Sacramento Kings coach Dave Joerger (center) and California Farm Bureau Federation president Jamie Johansson.

Joerger, head coach of the Sacramento Kings, and California Secretary of Food and Agriculture Karen Ross were among speakers at a lunchtime program that featured a demonstration of herding dogs.

“Students from the area gained firsthand experience in seeing where their food and fiber come from,” Culbertson said. “Agricultural education is more important now than ever before. Thanks to our partners, we are able to show students that agriculture is much more than driving tractors and feeding the cows. It involves science, math, creativity, art and more.”

The event marked the first Farm Day in Sacramento. Farm Day originated in San Francisco in 1980; the idea was to bring the farm to the city and to urban students who otherwise would not be able to experience agriculture up close.

Today, more than 25 Farm Days are held annually throughout the state. They’re hosted by county Farm Bureaus, county fairs and high school agriculture programs, Culbertson said. CFAITC provides resources and materials for the various Farm Days.

CFBF jumped on board this year by providing the property, staff, volunteers, insurance and other resources “allowing us to do what we wanted to do, to make it a big success,” Culbertson said.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Here’s why California farmers are the toughest of all – Slide Show from Farm Futures

Photo by Leah Mills, San Francisco Chronicle

By Mike Wilson

Drought. Regulations. Migrant labor under scrutiny. Complex water rights. Urban encroachment. And now, frost.

In a high-stakes farm profit game, California farmers face these challenges and more with grit, smarts and determination.

Last week (the week of March 12) I crisscrossed the state to catch up with some of these growers and learn what drives them. They’re motivated by strong market prices driven by dynamic domestic and global demand for what they grow. California agriculture is a $45 billion business; it is the leading state in cash farm receipts. California’s 2016 net farm income, $13.8 billion, was still higher than nine of the leading Midwestern corn and soybean states combined. About half the nation’s fruits and vegetables come from here.

A lot of that revenue these days comes from tree crops, as costly land, fewer available workers and big world demand push farmers to tear out less profitable crops and drop dairies in favor of pistachios, walnuts and almonds.

Here’s a quick look at some of the issues California farmers face each business day.

Click here to start slide show

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Farmers for America – a movie about the present and the future

California farmers Megan Brown and Paul Grieve

California farmers Megan Brown and Paul Grieve

On Ag Day last week, the Center for Land Based Learning hosted a screening of a wonderful film, “Farmers for America,” created by Graham Meriwether and narrated by the excellent Mike Rowe. It’s a film I hope more organizations will bring to their local communities because it is such an important topic, and it poses some essential questions. Who will our farmers be? How can we support new and beginning farmers?

It was an honor to meet Graham and two California farmers in the film – Paul Grieve of Primal Pastures in Murietta and Megan Brown of Table Mountain Ranch in Butte County. The film captures the goodness of farmers and rural people – their connection to the land and love of community. It also addresses the challenges of farming and the stark reality of how dependent small towns across the rural landscape are on local farmers supporting local businesses, churches and schools.

The film shows hope and opportunity through the heartfelt desire of young people and returning veterans. They have a passion for farming and growing healthy food. Many of them are intent on building in their communities by selling directly to consumers through farmers’ markets and social media connections that will allow them to develop relationships with their customers and neighbors.

Please check out the film at: http://www.leaveitbetter.com/farmers-for-america/

I hope you’ll consider hosting a screening in your area soon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Meet Generation Z – from Food Business News

“Real food” is the rallying cry of Generation Z grocery shoppers, according to a recent report from The NPD Group.

Gen Z, those born between 1997 and the present, represent 27 percent of the U.S. population. They have higher consumption rates of organic foods and beverages than any other group, NPD said, and were taught to value food based on nutrition and function, not just in terms of taste.

“Food marketers should understand that this generation grew up knowing that food is much more than sustenance; food represents culture and therefore is an expression of who they are,” said David Portalatin, food industry adviser for NPD and author of Eating Patterns in America. “This generation was raised to be real and true to themselves, and they expect the same from their foods and beverages.”

Many assume Gen Z is a carbon copy of the millennial generation, and while they have similarities, the differences will “require grocers and food manufacturers to fine-tune their messages,” NPD said. Gen Zs are similar to millennials in their demand for authenticity, freshness and purity in their products, but more than millennials, Gen Z consumers say clean eating improves their quality of life and that fresh foods play a key role in their lifestyle. And they aren’t just saying that. Gen Z accounts for some of the heaviest use of organic and non-G.M.O. foods, according to NPD.

Gen Z consumers also differ from millennials in their attitude toward large brands. While millennials tend to favor smaller, niche, local brands, Gen Zs choose brands based on different criteria.

“In many ways Gen Z consumers think of themselves as having a personal brand with a story and values by which to live,” NP said. “They seek brands that support their story, and they are willing to use them regardless of a brand’s size.”

Gen Zs also approach snack foods differently. The generation’s on-the-go lifestyle lends itself to more read-to-eat foods that may be incorporated into or in between traditional meals.

 

“Snacking is just can extension of who this generation is,” Mr. Portalatin said. “They’re more likely than any other generation to incorporate snack foods as a part of … breakfast, lunch or dinner. In fact, they’re doing this at a rate 53 times more on a per capita basis annually than any other generations.

“Generation Z was born into the world of foodie culture. They’re growing up with a keen understanding of the purpose for food and the role that it plays in a well-lived life. They have the potential to be perhaps the most influential generation we’ve ever seen on consumers’ eating and drinking behaviors.”

Link to story

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

USDA announces funding in support of veterans and socially-disadvantaged farmers

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Office of Partnerships & Public Engagement (OPPE) today announced up to $8.4 million in available funding for training and technical assistance for socially disadvantaged and veteran farmers and ranchers. Funding is made through the USDA’s Outreach and Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers and Veteran Farmers and Ranchers Program (also known as the 2501 Program).

“The USDA is committed to reaching all farmers and ranchers,” said OPPE Director Diane Cullo. “Through the 2501 program, the USDA is building lasting relationships among these farmers and ranchers, the local organizations that serve them, and the USDA’s local, state, regional, and national offices.”

The 2501 Program was originally authorized by the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. 2501 grants seek to enhance the equitable participation of socially disadvantaged and veteran farmers and ranchers in USDA resources and programs, such as Farm Service Agency loans or grants through the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program (BFRDP). Projects may focus on conferences, training sessions, educational materials, or new programs to help these farmers and ranchers thrive and succeed.

Eligible applicants include community-based organizations, networks, or coalitions of community-based organizations; 1890 or 1994 institutions of higher education; American Indian tribal community colleges or Alaska Native cooperative colleges; Hispanic-serving institutions of higher education; other higher education institutions; Indian Tribes or national tribal organizations. Eligible entities must have experience in providing agricultural education or other agricultural-related services for socially disadvantaged and veteran farmers and ranchers.

The deadline for applications is May 15, 2018. See the request for applications for full details. Learn more about this funding opportunity through two teleconferences on March 28, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. EST and April 25, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. EST. To join each session, call 1-888-455-1685 and use passcode 7087935.

Examples of FY 2017 funded 2501 projects include a grant to the National Hmong American Farmers, Inc., to provide technical and direct assistance to Hmong farmers in central California who face barriers to successful farming due to poverty and cultural and linguistic isolation. A Florida State University project reached veterans with workshops, online agricultural courses, and 15 farm apprenticeships and managerial apprenticeships at private farms.

Link to USDA news release

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fresno State study examines economic impact of strawberries – from the Business Journal

By David Castellon

Fresno State researchers have concluded that non-farm workers and businesses that contribute to strawberry production, packing and distribution in five Southern California counties generate more than $2.7 billion in revenues annually.

 

The study, commissioned by the California Strawberry Commission, was conducted by economists who determined that a wide range of businesses in the counties support the state’s fourth largest crop.

 

The report, titled “Southern California Economy: Contributions from the Strawberry Supply Chain,” surveyed businesses in Los Angeles, San Diego, Ventura, Orange and Riverside counties.

 

“Our research found that strawberries and Southern California’s urban economy are strongly linked and benefit one another,” Annette Levi, a professor and chair of university’s Agricultura Business Department, said in a press release from the Strawberry Commission. “We were surprised at the interdependence between rural farming and jobs in Los Angeles and Orange Counties.”

 

“What made this research so unique is that it provides a micro-view of a crop’s supply chain within an urban setting,” said Levi, who conducted the research with her Fresno State colleague. “It has long been assumed that California agriculture has a major ripple effect on the urban economy. This study documents how one crop, strawberries, plays a major role in supporting non-farm businesses.”

 

Other parts of the state where strawberries are commercially produced weren’t included in the study. On the whole, California produces nearly 90 percent of U.S.-grown strawberries.

 

KEY FINDINGS

-Non-farm urban strawberry value-chain businesses generate nearly $3 billion in economic returns in Southern California.

-Growers in the region contribute another $1 billion of economic activity in the
Southern California counties, for a total of nearly $4 billion in economic returns.

-The supply chain in the Southern California
urban centers has a diversity of companies
providing products and services for the
strawberry industry, including packaging,
precooling, shipping, processing, retailing
and more.

-A number of businesses often boast of a
diverse workforce that includes an equal
number of women and men — many of
whom are Latinos and Asians – with a wide
range of educational backgrounds.

Link to report

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A look back at Ag Day 2018

Posted in Agricultural Marketing, Climate Change | Leave a comment