Planting Seeds - Food & Farming News from CDFA

Secretary Ross reports on meeting with Vietnamese Ag officials

Secretary Ross (center) with members of a Vietnamese agriculture delegation. Also representing CDFA was Dr. Amrith Gunasekara (second from right), of the Office of Environmental farming Initiatives, and Natalie Krout (third from left), director of Inspection Services.

Secretary Ross (center) with members of a Vietnamese agriculture delegation. Also representing CDFA were Dr. Amrith Gunasekara (second from left), of the Office of Environmental Farming Initiatives, and Natalie Krout (third from left), director of Inspection Services.

A great meeting late Friday with Vietnam Vice Minister Tran Thanh Nam and his delegation. They were in California for farm visits, time with UC Davis and to continue discussions on climate smart agriculture that began during my visit to Vietnam in April. Vietnam is also suffering from a drought and the group was very impressed with our on-farm water efficient drop and sub-surface micro-drip technologies. We both agreed it would be spectacular to be able to foster farmer-to-farmer exchanges!

I am looking forward to opportunities for continued collaboration and know we can build a great friendship based on mutual interests in serving farmers. I am so fortunate to have these opportunities to meet with leaders from so many countries.

The photo was taken at Stanford Mansion, which is the official state venue for hosting visiting delegations. It is a beautiful and impressive venue to showcase California history!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

California drought enters its sixth year – from the Los Angeles Times

The San Luis Reservoir along California highway 152 is only 10% full, its lowest level in 27 years. (Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

The San Luis Reservoir along California highway 152 is only 10 percent full, its lowest level in 27 years. (Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

By Matt Stevens

There were high hopes going into water year 2016.

To hear some forecasters and scientists tell it, El Niño was coming to save California. With a little luck and a lot of rain, the drought might finally recede in its fifth year — or at least loosen its grip on the state.

The weather phenomenon did show up, fueling some storms in Northern California. But it fell far short of the lofty expectations.

On Friday, water year 2016 ended with a whimper.

“If you had to put a one-word descriptor on this water year, it would be ‘dry,’” said Doug Carlson, a spokesman for the California Department of Water Resources.

“The [precipitation] indexes have been flat-lining since June,” he said. “If this was a body, it would be in cardiac arrest.”

And if weather-watchers learned anything from the latest cycle, it’s not to guess about what might come next.

“Anybody who tells you what’s going to happen next year is a liar or delusional,” said Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Control Board. “The best they can say is what the trends might be and what the odds might say.”

Though the rain and snow that California got did help refill reservoirs and replenish groundwater basins, the precipitation also may have muddied the state’s drought messaging in ways that did harm to conservation efforts.

Experts track the state’s hydrology based on a calendar that begins on Oct. 1 — when the rainy season begins — and ends on Sept. 30. Officials say water year 2015 was among the driest on record, so to some, 2016 may have left the impression of being a drought-buster.

Indeed, one highly cited index of eight weather stations in the northern Sierra Nevada shows the area got about 116% of normal precipitation during the last water year.

But officials are quick to point out that other indexes show about average rainfall in the San Joaquin Valley area and below average in the Tulare Basin.

Meanwhile, the state’s reservoirs — fed by the summer snow-melt — currently are at about 80% of their average storage.

According to water officials, warm temperatures melted a below-average snow pack earlier than usual. And since the water contained in California’s snow pack measured only about 85% of average this spring, the state actually had suffered a “snow drought.”

As of Friday, Lake Shasta had slightly more water in it than the historical average, but the San Luis Reservoir continued to hover near its lowest level in years. About 62% of the state remains in severe, extreme or exceptional drought, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor.

“It’s more of a patchwork picture,” Marcus said. “It’s still a drought — it’s just not that unprecedented, historic level.”

Because the situation has eased somewhat, the water board relaxed mandatory conservation requirements across much of urban California during the 2016 water year.

For 12 months beginning in June 2015, each of the state’s more than 400 urban water suppliers was required to reduce usage by a certain percentage. But as more and more rain arrived, regulators lowered many of the savings targets. Eventually, the majority of suppliers were released from mandatory conservation altogether.

Californians have continued to save water under the eased restrictions, but at a lower rate than in the summer of 2015.

Regulators have warned that they could impose high water conservation levels again if California experiences another dry winter. And the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Prediction Center has suggested that weak La Niña conditions — which correlate with those dry winters — could develop.

But officials need not look back far to be reminded that forecasts can be wrong.

“Last year,” Marcus said, “people predicted we’d get the Godzilla of El Niños, and we got Mr. Stay Puft.”

Link to article

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

October is National Farm to School Month

Farm to school (2)

Note – CDFA’s Office of Farm to Fork works to connect consumers, school districts, and others directly with California’s farmers and ranchers. The office also is committed to reducing food insecurity.   

By Deborah Kane, National Director, USDA Farm to School Program

Along with brilliantly colored hard squash, crisp apples, and hearty greens, October ushers in National Farm to School Month, a time to raise awareness about and celebrate the impact of farm to school programs on children, producers, and communities. Each year we have more to celebrate: more USDA funds awarded to schools, agencies, and organizations to advance these programs; more money ending up in the pockets of local producers; more school gardens in which students can learn and grow; and more healthful school meals that feature local foods.

A new report, announced by Agriculture Secretary Vilsack earlier this month, helps quantify our celebration. An analysis of grant-making over the last three years reveals that USDA has awarded $15.1 million through 221 grants in 49 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Fifty percent of funded projects included expanding healthy menu options offered in the cafeteria; 46 percent included training for food service staff about menu planning, meal preparation, and cooking with local and regional foods; and 65 percent included nutrition education activities. These funds have helped 12,300 schools improve nutritious meal options made with local ingredients for 6.9 million students, while expanding market opportunities for family farmers and ranchers in their communities.

Of course, these numbers really come to life through the stories behind them. Through the USDA Farm to School Grant Program and our other training and technical assistance efforts, we have had the privilege of hearing countless stories of farm to school success firsthand. We have learned that farm to school works. Within the FNS there is a growing recognition that community food systems – those in which food production, processing, distribution and consumption are integrated and proximal—are a boon to our programs. That’s why this month we’re also celebrating the creation of a new office, the Office of Community Food Systems, within the FNS’ Child Nutrition Programs.

The establishment of the office allows us to extend our current focus on local foods beyond theNational School Lunch Program and its associated programs to include both the Summer Food Service Program and Child and Adult Care Food Program and embed this approach in on-going programmatic activities throughout all child nutrition divisions.

When USDA’s Farm to School Program was first established by the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, we set a goal that one day every child that participates in our nutrition assistance programs would have daily access to local foods. With the creation of a new Office of Community Food Systems, and the work of countless community partners that we’re honored to fund, we’re closer than ever to making that vision a reality. Happy Farm to School Month indeed!

Link to USDA blog post

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

#Farm2Fan video series – Porterville’s hand-harvested olives

California Grown and Visit California are teaming up to produce the #Farm2Fan video series, profiling farms throughout California and fans of those farms who stop by for a visit.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Secretary Ross at kick-off event for 2016 California State Employees Food Drive

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross appeared today at the kickoff event for the annual California State Employees Food Drive, a fresh fruit and vegetable donation opportunity at the Capitol Mall Farmers’ Market in Sacramento. Secretary Ross serves as chair of the food drive.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

California to receive $11.7 million in grant funding for FSMA produce safety rule

FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Logo

CDFA was recently awarded $11.7 million for state-level implementation of the Produce Safety Rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). This follows the recent Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) announcement to invest $21.8 million in 42 states.

In order to secure the five-year funding opportunity, states were asked to submit implementation proposals tailored to their jurisdiction’s needs.

CDFA’s proposal considered all necessary resources required of California’s diverse produce industry, along with consideration for the various production and packing operations throughout the state. The multi-year plan to implement an enhanced produce safety system emphasizes the following:

• Education, Outreach, and Technical Assistance
• Inspectional Program Development
• Infrastructure Development
• Collaboration with Federal, State, & Territory Regulatory Entities
• Annual Work Plan Development
• Continued training of Regulatory Body

CDFA’s funding is based on a vision of education preceding regulation. This funding will help further FSMA implementation efforts as well as the continued commitment to a safe food supply. Both points are important to a state withr an agriculture industry providing more than one-third of the country’s vegetables and two-thirds of the country’s fruits and nuts.

CDFA will continue working on front-line preventive efforts, and is committed to ensuring that farmers receive a clear path to compliance.

The cooperative work between the FDA and CDFA will continue moving forward to meet the initial FSMA compliance date, with larger farms needing to comply with certain aspects of the Produce Safety Rule beginning in January 2018, and smaller produce operations having additional time to comply.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

An overlooked water resource – from the Christian Science Monitor

By Diana Donlon

In bone-dry California we are counting the days until October when the rainy season should begin.

When wells run dry in the Central Valley, fires rage in Big Sur and pine forests in the Sierra Nevada die off, you can’t help but wonder where all the water has gone. But what if we asked a slightly different question: where should the water be?

To answer this it helps to know that soil hydrologists classify fresh water as either blue or green, according to Henry Lin, Professor of Hydropedology / Soil Hydrology at Penn State University.

“Blue water refers to water collected in rivers, lakes, wetlands and groundwater,” said Lin. “Blue water is available for withdrawal before it evaporates or meets the ocean. Green water refers to water absorbed by soil and plants and is then released back into the air. Green water is unavailable for withdrawal.”

Nevertheless, it may be surprising to learn that what ends up as blue water represents only approximately 38.8 percent of total precipitation, whereas what ends up as green water represents the remaining approximately 61.1 percent of precipitation.

Although green water clearly represents the lion’s share of precipitation, as Professor Lin states, “green water is an often overlooked resource.”

Why do we fail to see the green water—the water that is stored in soils and consumed by plants?

Film-maker Deborah Koons Garcia provides one hypothesis. Koons Garcia, who wrote and directed Symphony of the Soil, an homage to Earth’s living soil system, points out that most people are “soil blind.”

If we “saw soil,” she says we would recognize that when it is healthy, soil acts like a giant sponge that absorbs water during floods and provides it to plants in times of drought. We would also “see” the difference between soils that have structure and soils that don’t. In order for soil to store water effectively it must have organic matter, or carbon. This carbon gives soil the structure necessary to carry out its filtering and holding functions. When rain falls on soils that are carbon deficient, the water isn’t absorbed into the soil sponge.

Instead, the rain sloughs off the ground’s surface, dragging valuable topsoil along with it. This is what is referred to as ineffective rainfall and it is how green water starts to go missing from the soil sponge.

The good news is that soil blindness can be easily cured by learning something about soil’s remarkable potential, and rainfall can be made more effective. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has determined that a one percent increase in organic matter (carbon) in the top six inches of soil increases its holding capacity by approximately 27,000 gallons of water per acre.

Increasing soil carbon can be done in a number of ways including cover-cropping, composting and planting deep-rooted perennials. The average farm size in California is 312 acres. Increasing the soil carbon content by one percent on just one farm (27,000 gallons x 312 acres) has the potential to yield an additional 8,424,000 gallons of green water. Multiply that by California’s 81,500 farms and you begin to grasp the transformative potential that increasing soil carbon by a mere one percent would have on the state’s green water supply.

“Worldwide,” says Lin, “nearly 90 percent of water consumed by croplands is green water making green water key to global food security and land use.”

Once we start actually seeing soil, we can realize that much of the water that has gone missing is of the green variety. The next step is to increase the organic matter on our fields so that when the rains finally come we’ll have forged the conditions to recreate the soil sponge.

Link to article

 

 

Posted in Drought, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why industrial farms are good for the environment – op-ed in the New York Times

Fields of crops with mountain background

By Jayson Lusk, professor of agricultural economics, Oklahoma State University

There is much to like about small, local farms and their influence on what we eat. But if we are to sustainably deal with problems presented by population growth and climate change, we need to look to the farmers who grow a majority of the country’s food and fiber.

Large farmers — who are responsible for 80 percent of the food sales in the United States, though they make up fewer than 8 percent of all farms, according to 2012 data from the Department of Agriculture — are among the most progressive, technologically savvy growers on the planet. Their technology has helped make them far gentler on the environment than at any time in history. And a new wave of innovation makes them more sustainable still.

A vast majority of the farms are family­ owned. Very few, about 3 percent, are run by non-family corporations. Large farm owners (about 159,000) number fewer than the residents of a medium­-size city like Springfield, Mo. Their wares, from milk, lettuce and beef to soy, are unlikely to be highlighted on the menus of farm-­to-table restaurants, but they fill the shelves at your local grocery store.

There are legitimate fears about soil erosion, manure lagoons, animal welfare and nitrogen runoff at large farms — but it’s not just environmental groups that worry. Farmers are also concerned about fertilizer use and soil runoff. That’s one reason they’re turning to high-­tech solutions like precision agriculture. Using location-­specific information about soil nutrients, moisture and productivity of the previous year, new tools, known as “variable rate applicators,” can put fertilizer only on those areas of the field that need it (which may reduce nitrogen runoff into waterways). GPS signals drive many of today’s tractors, and new planters are allowing farmers to distribute seed varieties to diverse spots of a field to produce more food from each unit of land. They also modulate the amount and type of seed on each part of a field — in some places, leaving none at all.

Many food shoppers have difficulty comprehending the scale and complexity facing modern farmers, especially those who compete in a global marketplace. For example, the median lettuce field is managed by a farmer who has 1,373 football fields of that plant to oversee. For tomatoes, the figure is 620 football fields; for wheat, 688 football fields; for corn, 453 football fields. How are farmers able to manage growing crops on this daunting scale? Decades ago, they dreamed about tools to make their jobs easier, more efficient and better for the land: soil sensors to measure water content, drones, satellite images, alternative management techniques like low­ and no­till farming, efficient irrigation and mechanical harvesters.

Today, that technology is a regular part of operations at large farms.   Farmers watch the evolution of crop prices and track thunderstorms on their smartphones. They use livestock waste to create electricity using anaerobic digesters, which convert manure to methane. Drones monitor crop yields, insect infestations and the location and health of cattle. Innovators are moving high­-value crops indoors to better control water use and pests. Before “factory farming” became a pejorative, agricultural scholars of the mid­ 20th century were calling for farmers to do just that — become more factory-like and business-like. From that time, farm sizes have risen significantly. It is precisely this large size that is often criticized today in the belief that large farms put profit ahead of soil and animal health. But increased size has advantages, especially better opportunities to invest in new technologies and to benefit from economies of scale. Buying a $400,000 combine that gives farmers detailed information on the variations in crop yield in different parts of the field would never pay on just five acres of land; at 5,000 acres, it is a different story.

These technologies reduce the use of water and fertilizer and harm to the environment. Modern seed varieties, some of which were brought about by biotechnology, have allowed farmers to convert to low­ and no-­till cropping systems, and can encourage the adoption of nitrogen­fixing cover crops such as clover or alfalfa to promote soil health. Herbicide­-resistant crops let farmers control weeds without plowing, and the same technology allows growers to kill off cover crops if they interfere with the planting of cash crops. The herbicide­-resistant crops have some downsides: They can lead to farmers’ using more herbicide (though the type of herbicide is important, and the new crops have often led to the use of safer, less toxic ones). But in most cases, it’s a trade­off worth making, because they enable no­-till farming methods, which help prevent soil erosion. These practices are one reason soil erosion has declined more than 40 percent since the 1980s.

Improvements in agricultural technologies and production practices have significantly lowered the use of energy and water, and greenhouse ­gas emissions of food production per unit of output over time. United States crop production now is twice what it was in 1970. That would not be a good change if more land, water, pesticides and labor were being used. But that is not what happened: Agriculture is using nearly half the labor and 16 percent less land than it did in 1970. Instead, farmers increased production through innovation. Wheat breeders, for example, using traditional techniques assisted by the latest genetic tools and information, have created varieties that resist disease without numerous applications of insecticides and fungicides. Nearly all corn and soybean farmers practice crop rotation, giving soil a chance to recover.

Research is moving beyond simple measures of nitrogen and phosphorus content to look at the microbes in the soil. New industry-wide initiatives are focused on quantifying and measuring soil health. The goal is to provide measurements of factors affecting the long­term value of the soil and to identify which practices — organic, conventional or otherwise — will ensure that farmers can responsibly produce plenty of food for our grandchildren.

Link to article

 

 

Posted in Climate Change, Environment, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

USDA awards nearly $300K to regional organizations for programs serving new and underserved farmers

The U.S. Department Agriculture (USDA) has announced that nearly $300,000 will be awarded to regional organizations in California to train and educate new and underserved farmers and ranchers on Farm Service Agency (FSA) programs and services.

The University of California-Davis will receive $75,000 to provide financial literacy training to small-scale, new and specialty crop and livestock producers in the Northern California foothills.  State Center Community College District will concentrate its $20,000 in funding toward outreach and education efforts to California’s Central Valley. California Farmlink will receive $75,000 to establish financial management workshops offering participants access to important business tools and resources.

Additionally, Fresno’s Valley Small Business Development Corporation will receive $50,000 to provide outreach to Central Valley farmers and ranchers seeking support and services from FSA programs; $20,000 will be provided to National Hmong American Farmers of Fresno to work with underserved growers and help them obtain crop insurance; and Sustainable Agriculture Education of Berkeley will receive $58,727 to help new farmers and ranchers develop business plans, obtain crop insurance and improve the success of their operations.

The announcement is the latest in a series of cooperative agreements between USDA FSA and organizations designed to promote agriculture. To date, $2.5 million has been awarded to 60 nonprofit organizations, universities and foundations in 28 states.  FSA administers farm commodity safety net, credit, conservation and emergency assistance programs for farmers and ranchers. To learn more about the cooperative agreements and participating organizations, visit www.fsa.usda.gov/outreach or contact your local FSA county office.  Local FSA offices can be found by visiting http://offices.usda.gov.

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Elementary school students learn about critters at CDFA lab

A group of eight and nine year-olds from Sacramento's Merryhill visted CDFA's Meadowview laboratory complex this week to learn about the agency's work to protect the state from invasive species.

A group of eight and nine year-olds from Sacramento’s Merryhill School visited CDFA’s Plant Pest Diagnostics Center this week to learn about the agency’s work to protect the state from invasive species.

Several students had an opportunity to meet a nematode, up close and personal.

Several students had an opportunity to meet an invasive species, up close and personal.

The students all received this coloring book to commemorate their visit.

The students all received this coloring book to commemorate their visit.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment