Planting Seeds - Food & Farming News from CDFA

TPP will benefit California – from the California Farm Bureau federation

tpp-made-in-america-300x200

With the release of the full text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, the California Farm Bureau Federation urged the state’s congressional delegation to support the agreement. The TPP would reduce barriers to trade among the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations.

“We’re glad to have the text of the agreement available, and we expect that to ease concerns people might have about the TPP,” CFBF President Paul Wenger said. “Fairer, more open trade will benefit people in all the countries represented in the agreement and in California, the opportunity to sell more goods in other countries will lead to new opportunities in both rural and urban areas.”

Because of California’s proximity to the Pacific Rim nations participating in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Wenger said the state is “uniquely positioned” to gain from it.

“California-grown food and farm products have a worldwide reputation for high quality, and our ports have the ability to deliver those products efficiently,” he said. “Farm exports provide jobs in rural areas, of course, but also lead to jobs at warehouses, ports, trucking companies and other urban businesses that move farm goods to customers around the world.”

For that reason, he said, California congressional representatives should support the TPP.

“We will be working with our representatives in Congress to describe the benefits of the agreement to their constituents, no matter what part of the state they represent,” Wenger said.

Link to news release

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Map IDs farmland with greatest potential for replenishing ground water – from the University of California

groundwater map
This map helps identify farmlands with the most potential to capture groundwater and help recharge the aquifer.
Credit: California Soil Resources Lab, UC Davis

By Diane Nelson, UC Davis

Growers, researchers, policymakers and others can now pinpoint California’s most promising parcels of farmland to help replenish the state’s dwindling groundwater supplies, thanks to a new interactive map developed by the California Soil Resource Lab at the University of California, Davis. The Soil Agricultural Groundwater Banking Index provides site-specific information on millions of acres of California farmland based on previous research led by Toby O’Geen, a UC Cooperative Extension specialist with the UC Davis Department of Land, Air and Water Resources.

Before designing the Web-based map, O’Geen and his team identified about 3.6 million acres of farmland with good potential for groundwater banking, based on how likely the land could accommodate deep percolation with little risk of crop damage or groundwater contamination.

“A lot of growers are interested in learning how they can help improve the groundwater situation in California,” O’Geen said. “The index provides details on the groundwater-recharge potential for any parcel, which you can search for by address or access using your device’s GPS.”

Absorbing El Niño

Water tables have plummeted by more than 100 feet in some areas of California, as growers and others dig more wells and pump deeper into the Earth to replace diminishing surface-water supplies.

If a much-anticipated El Niño arrives this winter, California’s vast acres of farmland may hold the key to groundwater recharge by absorbing rainfall and flood flows.

“During storms and flood-control releases, excess river water could be routed through irrigation canals onto farms, where the surplus would seep underground to replenish groundwater,” said professor Helen Dahlke with the UC Davis Department of Land, Air and Water Resources. “On-farm flooding could also mitigate downstream flood risks.”

Rain check

What can farmers and water managers do in preparation for a potentially wet winter? UC Davis researchers offer these tips:

  • Minimize fall applications of fertilizers and pesticides to protect groundwater quality.
  • Maximize water infiltration by reducing soil compaction and improving soil structure with cover crops and amendments like mulch, compost, and gypsum.
  • Clear and repair irrigation canals this fall, before the storms arrive.
  • Clarify water rights as they pertain to capturing and applying large amounts of floodwater to cropland.

This December, Dahlke and a team of scientists will flood almond fields in the Central Valley, building on research that suggests that deliberately flooding farmland in winter can replenish aquifers without harming crops or drinking water.

“Adding an extra few feet of water to even just 10 percent of California’s cropland this winter could add an additional 3 million acre-feet of groundwater,” Dahlke said. “That could go a long way toward replenishing the 6 million acre-feet growers had to pump this year alone to cope with California’s drought.”

Link to article

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

California wins coveted ‘World’s Best Rice’ award

Diamond G

A historic achievement for California rice – on the final day of the 7th Annual World Rice Conference, hosted this year in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, it was announced that the “World’s Best Rice” award had been won by California Calrose rice.

This is the first time California Calrose has been the sole recipient of the award. In 2013 it tied with Cambodia Jasmine rice.

The winning rice was chosen from a field of entries submitted by delegates from countries around the globe. The “World’s Best Rice” is decided by a panel of experts and international chefs, one of which was Chef Matthew Teruo Sato, whose Sacramento restaurant Ten22 won this year’s “Lord of Rice” culinary competition. The panel inspected the visual aspect of the rice and performed a sensory evaluation (pre-cooked and cooked).

Calrose is a medium-grain white rice that originated in California.  Nearly 2.5 million tons of rice are grown annually in the state, produced by nearly 2,500 farmers. California is the second largest rice growing state in the nation.

California rice is exported to Japan, Korea and Taiwan; the Middle East and Mediterranean markets; and the Caribbean and Pacific Islands. It is widely distributed throughout the United States, to the Korean and Japanese communities; specialty restaurants; and health food markets. Preferred for its processing characteristics, makers of cereals, baby food, rice flour and crisped rice for candy and health bar manufacturing all utilize California rice.

More than 550,000 acres or 98 percent of California’s rice is grown within 100 miles of Sacramento. For the rural Sacramento Valley counties of Colusa, Butte, Sutter and Yuba, rice is a primary crop and provides a substantial contribution to the economy.

Link to item at the California Rice Exchange

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

‘Farm to Folks’ – from the Growing California video series

The latest segment in the Growing California video series, a partnership with California Grown, is “Farm to Folks.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Secretary Ross calls on college students to lead change – from the San Luis Obispo Tribune

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross at Cal Poly , San Luis Obispo

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo

By Nick Wilson

The state’s top agriculture leader urged about 250 people — mostly Cal Poly students — Thursday to lead change in the agriculture industry by taking innovative steps to conserve water and encouraging new and efficient ways to farm globally.

“In times of crisis, leadership can take hold and solve problems here and beyond borders,”Karen Ross, secretary of the Department of Food and Agriculture, urged the group in a campus forum at the university’s Chumash Auditorium. “You are going to change the world and for the positive.”

It was her third visit to the university this year to maintain a dialogue with the university on its research. This week, she met with faculty whose expertise includes hydrology and other water issues, animal health, climate change and healthy soils.

“I think the conversation with Cal Poly goes both ways,” Ross said. “There are initiatives that I can learn from and take back home and Cal Poly can be made aware of grants and programs. We’re leveraging our resources.”

Ross spoke to mostly students from the College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences for about an hour.

A common thread of the discussion concerned the threat of losing significant amounts of agricultural land in California due to commercial and residential development, taxes associated with inheritance of farm land and a decline in multi-generational farming. Feeding a world population that’s projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050 is a key concern.

She spoke about encouraging smaller-scale farming on the outskirts of metropolitan areas and working to educate the public on organic foods as well as genetically modified foods.

“I think what you sometimes get is people wanting to say we should go all GMO or all organic, but how can you make this so both can work?” Ross said. “I don’t think it’s a one or the other scenario. We need to figure out the best possible way to feed the world.”

Ross also touched on issues related to the drought, including the need to focus on conservation and stormwater capture efforts well into the future, even if the anticipated El Niño hits California this year.

She said California is taking the lead on promoting drought-tolerant landscaping, establishing and working towards conservation targets set by Gov. Jerry Brown, and finding ways to collect and store water from rains.

“Let’s not go back to predrought habits,” Ross said. “Let’s work to save those precious drops, and show our leadership worldwide.”

Ross is a proponent of immigration reform, which she believes could help address a shortage in farm labor. But she said partisan gridlock has stalled any chance of substantial change.“Especially with the election coming up, I just don’t see any progress with getting any legislation passed,” Ross said. “Nothing’s going to happen.”

She noted that Gov. Jerry Brown visited Mexico last year to hammer out an agreement with the Mexican government to protect worker rights in the H-2A program, which allows foreign entry into the U.S. for seasonal agricultural work under certain conditions. But she said more comprehensive reform is needed to meet the labor demand.

Ross said California’s economy, ranked eighth in the world in terms of gross state product, is in position to market its products to countries seeking to improve their nutritional habits and become more health-conscious.

She said China previously rejected almonds, for example, but the nut has gained more cultural acceptance through marketing campaigns.

Ross wants to share best practices with farmers in countries such as India and Africa.

“There’s so much that can be done to teach and spread innovation around the world,” Ross said. “Millenials are the ones who will create this change and solve problems so that people in Africa are farming more efficiently and we have sustainable systems around the globe.”

Link to article

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A food safety partnership with Alvin and the Chipmunks

The USDA’s agency of Food Safety and Inspection Services is joining the Ad Council and Alvin and the Chipmunks (new movie: The Road Chip) to promote food safety with a video PSA targeted for children.

The PSA discusses the importance of safe food handling through the four steps to food safety: Clean, Separate, Cook and Chill.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

“Big Data” and agriculture – from Agri-Pulse

Deere Cab2

By Whitney Forman-Cook

The House Agriculture Committee heard from the private sector Wednesday on how it plans to safely use the “big data” American producers collect with farm equipment during their day-to-day operations.

“Big data has what seems like a boundless potential to improve the efficiency, profitability and competiveness of our nation’s farmers and ranchers,” Chairman Mike Conaway said in his opening statement. But before the benefits of big data can be fully realized, the Texas Republican said, an important question needs answering: How can privacy and private property rights be protected when farmers willingly hand their data over to private companies?

Today’s farmers generate data regularly with their modern tractors, combines, sprayers and planters equipped with computers, sophisticated sensors and GPS. These highly intelligent machines can record data on an inch-by-inch scale, giving farmers precise information they can use to effectively adjust input levels, maximize yields and even reduce sediment and nutrient runoff.

Away from the farm, the same data can be used to inform product development, manufacturing, trade and potentially agriculture policy, if producers allow their information to be sent to a virtual repository known as the “cloud.”

Take AGCO, for instance. Matt Rushing, a vice president for the farm equipment manufacturer told lawmakers at the hearing that the company “encourages growers to share” the data its machines collect to better understand what can be done to improve its product.

And even though the data is transferred to AGCO via cloud computing systems for use by the company, Rushing said the farmer still “owns and should have control and responsibility for the data generated by his or her operation.”

Climate Corporation, the company responsible for the Climate FieldView Platform that uses real-time and historical crop and weather data to make farm management prescriptions, also asks producers to share their data.

“As a company that will utilize our customers’ data in the course of developing these transformational digital tools, we take our commitment to safe-guarding that data very seriously,” said Mike Stern, the president and CEO of the company, which was acquired by Monsanto in 2013. Those safeguards include a guarantee that the farmers’ data will only be used for the services they subscribe to, it won’t be sold or shared with third parties, and that it can upon request be removed from the company system if a farmer decides to cut ties.

Big data could, in theory, end up in the wrong hands however. The witnesses described situations where an investor could use aggregated data gathered by companies for an unfair advantage in the futures markets. And they raised the possibility that regulators could use the data to identify which farms are conservation compliant, and which are no longer eligible for crop insurance or other assistance programs.

Missouri Farm Bureau President Blake Hurst testified that his group, commodity associations such as the American Soybean Association and a number of big agribusinesses, including John Deere, DuPont Pioneer, Monsanto, are committed to developing a framework for the safe and transparent transfer of data that helps and protects farmers. But the government has to stay out of it, Hurst stressed.

“Farmers prefer this teamwork, ‘business-to-business’ approach over a regulatory approach or legislative ‘fix’ because we believe the market will provide the process to address problems if farmers have an equal footing with agribusinesses,” Hurst said. “If we rely on the government to make changes, the undue overhead might irreversibly deter innovation.”

The other hearing witnesses agreed that Congress could play a minor supportive role, but the free market should be allowed to establish its own standardized and secure process for transfer of agricultural data.

Billy Tiller, a fourth generation farmer, has done just that. As the cofounder and director of the Grower Information Service Cooperative (GiSC) – a farmer-owned data cooperative that advocates for grower data ownership and transparency in private sector data handling – Tiller testified that “big data” will only benefit family operations if farmers can safely share their information with other parties.

That’s why GiSC is developing “a secure data platform” that “integrates and stores data from the myriad of technologies adopted by the ag community” and also “allow growers to share data with others” while maintaining ownership.

GiSC said its platform will be called “AgXchange,” and expects its current membership of 1,300 farmers in 37 states to grow once it’s formally deployed.

Link to article

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Groundwater for the future: Sustainable Conservation’s partnership with the Almond Board of California

Farms are encouraged to accept flood flows from farms to help recharge groundwater.

Farms are encouraged to accept flood flows from storms to help recharge groundwater.

From Sustainable Conservation:

After a harrowing string of dry years, California pines for wet weather. With summer in the rearview mirror, our farms, communities, and wildlife sure could use a hydrating boost this winter.

The Golden State’s record-breaking drought has prompted widely voiced concerns about farming’s use of water. At the same time, our agricultural sector helps
feed the nation. How can California conserve and protect water while providing sustenance to millions?

Sustainable Conservation has a plan to marry these pivotal actions. Expanding upon
our work in the Kings River Basin, we’re mobilizing San Joaquin Valley farmers to accept flood flows from pending storms onto active cropland to help replenish groundwater – California’s underground “savings account” for parched seasons.

And, we’re thrilled to announce a remarkable new partner in our outreach: the 
Almond Board of California. The key group – which represents nearly 7,000 almond growers and processors on approximately one million acres throughout the state – has committed to being part of California’s groundwater solution with us.

With forecasts calling for strong El Niño rains, we’re just in time. Throughout the arid months of summer and into the fall, Sustainable Conservation has been working diligently to line up willing farmers with the right soils to demonstrate our strategy as soon as precipitation returns.


The technique more closely mimics the natural floodplain process of rivers spreading seasonally across the valley and recharging over-tapped aquifers below. By allowing waterways to stream back onto agricultural lands with sandy, permeable soils and applying water at rates compatible with crop production, we can also reduce the risk of flooding to downstream communities.


“Both the Almond Board and Sustainable Conservation believe that a healthy environment and farming sector can only be achieved through collaboration and uniting around common goals.”
Ashley Boren, Executive Director, Sustainable Conservation

Through nearly 100 innovative Almond Board-funded research projects since 1994, California almond growers have incorporated irrigation practices that reduced the amount of water needed to grow each pound of almonds by 33%*.


As part of our partnership, a team of Almond Board-funded UC Davis researchers will monitor three of the ten demonstration plots we are selecting in the San Joaquin Valley to test on-farm recharge this winter. Findings will assist in identifying the orchard practices and recharge conditions best suited for almond tree health, and the Almond Board will map where additional orchards can be part of replenishing our subterranean stores.


Bold alliances are needed now more than ever, and we’re proud to join forces with this vital industry player to build a powerful buffer against future droughts. Ever the solution match-maker, we’re hoping to unite storm with soil very soon to the benefit of our Golden State’s environment and people.


“Almond growers understand and share the concerns of many Californians about agriculture’s impact on state and local water resources, especially during this prolonged drought. Almond growers are part of the fabric of their local communities, often living on the land that their families have farmed for generations. Their own families, communities, and neighbors are equally impacted by groundwater concerns. These efforts focus on leveraging a significant attribute of the California Almond industry – the land dedicated to growing almonds – to continue our efforts to do our part to realize a sustainable California water supply.”
Richard Waycott, President and CEO, Almond Board of California

Link to Sustainable Conservation

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Farmers Are Embracing Sustainability – You Just Aren’t Hearing About It (From The Huffington Post)

“Things are changing. It’s just how do you get them to change fast enough?”

By Joseph Erbentraut
Senior What’s Working Editor, The Huffington Post

When farmers make the news in relation to climate issues like droughts, floods or extreme heat, they are often described in opposition to both environmentalists and, sometimes, scientists alike.

But such a depiction doesn’t tell the full story of the many ways that some farmers and ranchers are adapting to the changing climate, embracing new approaches that reduce greenhouse gases, increase water quality and sustainably contribute to and improve America’s food supply.

In his new book, Two Percent Solutions for the Planet, Courtney White, co-founder and executive director of the Santa Fe-based Quivira Coalition, a nonprofit that works to find common ground between the worlds of conservation and agriculture, features 50 different examples of farmers and ranchers who are having success doing just that.

The percentage in the title, White explains, refers not only to the number of Americans who are farmers, but also to the low cost associated with the promising approaches he is spotlighting. His goal is that the other 98 percent of us will sit up and take note that real progress on seemingly daunting challenges like California’s drought is not only possible, but already taking place.

The Huffington Post recently spoke with White.

HuffPost: What led you to covering this subject matter and why did you choose to focus on examples of solutions? 

White: What I was seeing was a tremendous amount of innovation and entrepreneurial stuff on the ground that solved food issues and water issues, sustainable practices that we now call regenerative agriculture, but I was not seeing those stories in the media. I decided to take a run at it myself. The goal of this project was to try and chronicle or profile 50 different regenerative, sustainable, exciting practices I saw on the ground, not theoretical things, and try and make them interesting to get the word out to folks who don’t normally follow these issues very closely. The folks I profiled in this book have been at this for decades now working on these things.

It seems, particularly with an issue like the California drought, that farmers are often painted as the villains when it comes to issues of food and water security and our climate. Do you think some of that criticism is warranted?

Change happens first on the edges: Folks who are frustrated with the system or who have an idea that doesn’t fit with the current paradigm, unorthodox approaches, that’s where change starts. There’s always resistance. People don’t want to change and then we have an economy that’s built at big scale, so things that are innovative that can solve problems sometimes have trouble working their way in.

Over 20 years of doing this, what we call progressive or sustainable ranching has made a lot of progress, particularly along the lines of collaboration with environmentalists. It’s encouraging. Is it happening at scale fast enough? That’s not clear yet. But I wanted folks to know there are these alternative models out there. Some of them are brand new, some of them have been around for quite a while.

The challenge now, of course, is how do we take this innovation and put it to work. I tell folks we don’t need more solutions. We have a lot of them already and some of them have worked well. What we need to figure out is how to implement them at a scale that matters.

Do you come up against a lot of opposition from the sort of “old guard” with your approach to these issues? Do you think that is changing?

That’s a persistent challenge that we face. When I started the Quivira Coalition 20 years ago, everybody said to us that ranchers and environmentalists will never get along, which wasn’t true, and that this style of ranching will never work, which isn’t true. Today I hear people say the single best thing we can do for the planet is to stop eating red meat and that’s not true. There’s a lot of resistance to change on a lot of levels, but at the same time the challenges we face continue to rise. I see a race between the problems that are growing and our refusal to change to meet those challenges.

We can’t fight Big Ag. They have too much money. But we can make our case to consumers directly and I hope they will vote with their pocketbooks, with what they eat and who they support. But the other problem is changing peoples’ minds. There’s still lots of resistance too among the environmental community to progressive agriculture. As the challenges continue to mount, particularly on the climate front, I think people will see these as effective, profitable and appropriate practices. I think it’s just a matter of time. I’m hopeful about the urgency of it all. I’ve seen in 20 years the governmental agencies change their policies, ranchers change their practices, conservationists change their attitudes.

Do you have a particular story or two that you think best highlight the progress that is being made?

I think the interface between high-tech and low-tech in the chapter about agrivoltism, where solar panels are built above a farm field, is a great example of how we can bring scientific knowledge around tech to food production. The chapter on Farm Hack, where people are working together over the Internet to share data and using open source software to communicate. That kind of stuff is a really exciting way of bringing this all together. The way this generation is looking at these problems and trying to bring the knowledge and way of looking at the world through technology to the age-old problem of farming, the way technology meets the soil, I think really shows us the way into the future.

Personally I like the story of Sam Montoya in ranching. The question you hear all the time is how are we going to feed all these people? There are a lot more people coming — 9.6 billion by 2050 — and what you hear from Big Ag is that you can’t do it with organic farming and you have to go to more GMOs and all that. But Sam shows us how to double our sustainably intensified food production on his ranch with just cows, grass and water. He ran 220 head of cattle on 93 acres of land in New Mexico. That’s a lot of food coming from a little bit of land. There are answers to these problems if we’re willing to think differently and consider some new and some old practices.

So how do you think we get from here to there — to scaling up and making these sorts of practices that are working more widespread? 

Different folks think different things. I’m not a policy person, I’m an on-the-ground person, but I know there are lots of governmental policies that stand in the way of particularly small-scale agriculture. All of them are geared toward the very large scale and I know many people are frustrated by the red tape, but I don’t quite know what to suggest there. At some point, Congress is going to have to step in and encourage or incentivize these practices to some degree, but that’s a tall order.

A little more abstractly, I think the thing that links these all together for me is carbon. If we could have a carbon marketplace that would pay folks to pull carbon out of the atmosphere and store it in soils and then these practices would become part of a carbon economy, I think these practices would take off. And at some point the regenerative part of this has to be valued by consumers, people who want to pay for it. People who eat food and use electricity. All these folks work at small scales, but to go up, the economy has to decide that this is valuable, so let’s figure out how to pay them to do this.

What is the single biggest takeaway you hope the average person will take away from reading this book?

To understand these alternatives even exist. I really want to provoke and stimulate a reader so that if they went through the book and found one story that resonated with them. That’s why it’s about farming and ranching and tech and ecology, to appeal to different people and what they’re interested in and how they can find out more about it. To ask questions where they are and where they live. What can I do if I’m concerned about these problems, what can I do to participate and, particularly for folks who live in cities, where do I get my food? Do I get it from a system that is contributing to the problem or from farmers and ranchers who hold the solutions to these problems in their hands?

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

See the original article on The Huffington Post’s website, including additional video and photographs.

Posted in Climate Change, Environment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

GMO Testing Pilot Project to ensure compliance with National Organic Program

By Karen Ross, Secretary, California Department of Food and Agriculture
and Jenny Lester Moffitt, Deputy Secretary, California Department of Food and Agriculture

It has been said that “California is the capital of organic.” The strength of that statement is a tribute to our state’s and our industry’s ability and willingness to lead, create and innovate. California’s organic growers have put in the work, the time, and the investment to farm according to a set of practices that sets them and their crops apart. And the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) and its State Organic Program (SOP) have worked alongside those growers since 2003 to make sure consumers can trust the integrity of organic agriculture and the farmers who grow it.

We see these efforts reflected in consumer preferences, at the farmers’ markets and the supermarkets, and on the labels of a growing number of products that are certified organic. For our growers, there is a certain amount of pride involved in this accomplishment, and achieving it has not come quickly or easily. It has been the result of substantial investment, careful planning and a healthy helping of persistence.

The community of organic growers works daily with the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) and its State Organic Program (SOP) to ensure the integrity of this vibrant, still-developing segment of our agricultural industry. The SOP staff and the state’s network of county agricultural commissioners are responsible for verifying the organic certification of vendors at certified farmers markets, sampling organic produce for pesticide residue testing, and other activities that support organic growers and their expanding market. The SOP also applies regulatory sanctions and provides due process to ensure consistent application of the law.

These same farmers have approached CDFA to develop a pilot project to conduct “blind” sampling to detect genetically modified organisms (GMO) in organic products. Growers, through their representatives on the California Organic Products Advisory Committee (COPAC), have been working with our SOP in recent months to design and implement this project. We are putting the finishing touches on contracts, and we expect to begin sampling soon for a period of one year.

“The members of our advisory committee believe this is an important step for organic farming in California,” said Melody Meyer, a COPAC member who serves as vice president of Policy and Industry Relations at United Natural Foods. “We have worked with the staff of our State Organic Program to develop a pilot project that will help ensure compliance with the national organic standards. That’s good for growers and policymakers, and it will also give retailers and consumers added confidence in the decisions they make in the marketplace.”

One important factor that has expedited our progress toward the launch of the pilot project is simply that the National Organic Program (NOP) already prohibits the use of GMOs in organic products: “Compliance with the organic standards entails that operations have verifiable practices in place to avoid contact with GMOs. Since organic certification is process-based, presence of detectable GMO residues alone does not necessarily constitute a violation of the regulation. The NOP relies on organic certifiers and producers to determine preventative practices that most effectively avoid contact with GMOs on an organic operation.” (Policy memo 11-13).

The pilot project is being funded from the existing SOP budget, as recommended by COPAC, and does not impact the funds that are dedicated to ongoing regulatory efforts by CDFA staff and through contracts with county agricultural commissioners’ offices. Our existing efforts include more than 1200 inspections and up to 300 samples for pesticide residues each year, along with more than 90 complaint investigations.

For our state’s organic farmers who are used to the way we already test for pesticide residues, this pilot project will follow similar protocols, with the exception that samples collected and tested during the pilot project will be “blind” – that is, the results will be collected in aggregate form to show us whether and how much GMO material is present in our crops overall, without identifying individual farms or farmers. That’s because the goal of the project is simply to gain a basic understanding of the presence and extent of any GMOs in the state’s organic crops. To ensure uniformity of the testing process, all sample collection will be done by CDFA staff during the pilot project.

The collection and testing of samples will be conducted on a limited number of raw agricultural organic products with known risks for GMOs, including alfalfa, canola, corn, soy, zucchini and summer squash, cattle feed, and seeds/seed crops.  That list could be expanded during or after the pilot project.

A final report on the findings from the pilot will be issued upon completion of the project, estimated to be late in 2016. These findings would be used by COPAC and the SOP to determine whether and how to proceed with any further work in this arena. Options would include incorporating the inspections into the ongoing SOP activities and under county contracts, expanding the list of commodities, considering additional labs/testing facilities, etc.

As we all work through this pilot project together, it is important to be mindful that the growers themselves stepped forward to make this happen. That kind of commitment and initiative is worth noticing. You have our commitment that CDFA will conduct this pilot project carefully and responsibly.

We look forward to this next step in the evolution of our oversight of organic agriculture in California. It truly speaks to the integrity of our farmers, and that’s something we can all be proud of.

 

Posted in Environment, Farmers' Markets, Nutrition | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment